For example, barely after Blinken returned to U.S. This renders the agreement reached during the visits difficult to implement. What is more baffling is that the hard-line comments by the officials after their China visits are highly inconsistent with the rational stance they seemed to take in China. This is for Biden to seize the moral high ground and political initiative in the upcoming presidential election - or, to put it simply, to have it both ways and thus gain more traction on both moral and political grounds as the stage is set for the election. They relapsed into harsh rhetoric, which is meant to demonstrate to both the hawkish and liberal interest groups at home (e.g., groupings that uphold “universal values” and anti-globalization labor unions) their resolve and ability to outcompete China. officials reiterated the view that China is America’s most “consequential” competitor. On the other hand, both before and after their visits to China, senior U.S. and realist interest groups (such as Wall Street and multinationals) his willingness and ability to communicate and cooperate with China. President Joe Biden, through the high-level exchanges, could demonstrate to rationalist folks in the U.S. but rather a “universal issue” - which also smacks of a kind of appeasement toward European allies who put environmental issues front and center. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry stressed that the environmental issue is not a bilateral one between China and the U.S. officials have repeatedly stressed their stance of not seeking confrontation nor decoupling from China, primarily out of attempt to give public reassurance to European allies and shore up its “leadership” position in the alliance. And both sides have agreed on “de-risking.” In the same vein, senior U.S. definition of China as “the most consequential” competitor, hence a systemic rival. The United States is meeting Europe halfway regarding its China policy bottom line of “no confrontation, no decoupling.” Europe has coalesced around the U.S. and its allies managed to iron out their differences in their approaches towards China at the G7 and NATO summits. presidential election.Įxternally, the U.S. The recent bipartisan compromise, despite fierce opposition by the far-right republican congressmen, to keep the government open, suggests that neither side desires to spoil the party for now, at least before the U.S. First of all, it concluded debt ceiling negotiations with the Republican Party, which at the time seemed to mean that bipartisan politics would remain on an even keel for some time. Obviously, there are many factors driving the decision of the Biden administration to initiate the exchanges. It’s a consensus that will unquestionably have a positive bearing on China and the United States and the future contours of the world. This understanding should be the basis upon which the two countries carry out high-level exchanges. Should the two major powers clash, especially in a way that spirals out of control, it would be an unbearable disaster for mankind. After all, we live in an increasingly integrated and interlinked world, communication and cooperation between China and the United States is conducive to the stability and development of the two countries and the world at large. The high-level exchanges suggest that it is a shared quest to prevent relations from spiraling out of control. national security adviser, demonstrated the breadth and depth of the exchanges and, more important, the willingness shared by both sides to reach some kind of compromise necessary for keeping the bilateral relationship at least manageable. In particular, the 12-hour meeting between Wang Yi, China’s minister of foreign affairs, and Jake Sullivan, the U.S. Although little is known to the public about the specific substance of these exchanges, both sides stated that the exchanges were candid and constructive. Recently, senior officials from the United States have made a flurry of visits to China and met with Chinese counterparts, including the topmost leader Xi Jinping, for lengthy and wide-ranging exchanges.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |